GLM 5.2 ranks third on ProgramBench, but the thread warns averages can mislead
jyangballin · x · 2026-07-23
GLM 5.2 has landed 3rd place on the ProgramBench leaderboard as the first open-weight model evaluated in the latest update. The discussion around the result also highlights a broader evaluation caveat: reporting only average pass rates can hide cases where a model is still failing a meaningful fraction of instances.
The thread argues that looking at the number of almost-resolved and fully resolved tasks is more informative than a single aggregate score, because a few stubborn failures can reveal major shortcomings even when the average looks strong.
Related event: GLM-5.2 Ranks Third on ProgramBench Leaderboard(3 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT 6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: speed and value vs raw capability — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27
- Harmonic Teases: AI Taught to Prove Math, 'Something Harder' Coming Soon — satnam6502 · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI quietly swaps Plus/Pro default to cheaper GPT-6.1 Terra and cuts Codex allowance — kimmonismus · 2026-10-27
- 'Never been this uninterested after an OpenAI model release' — theteknosaur · 2026-10-27
- Dev questions reports of Chinese models writing insecure code, citing thin methods and conflicts — dbreunig · 2026-10-27
- Aidan Gomez: LLM probing outside servers was out-of-bounds, not proof of intent — AccBalanced · 2026-10-27