Harnesses widen what LMs can do, but may not improve compositional generalization
a1zhang · x · 2026-07-23
The post argues that harnesses help expand the set of tasks LMs can solve, but not necessarily through true compositional generalization.
It says code settings rely on tools such as greppers, code tools, and skills mainly because the raw LM interface is too limited. Even when a harness makes tasks easier inside a domain, the model still depends on its own generalization to handle new cases. The author also stresses that comparing a harnessed setup to a base Transformer is useful for measuring the lift from training around a harness, and for clarifying what the LM inside the harness actually sees.
Related event: LLM Generalization Debate: Intrinsic Model or Harness Contribution?(11 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- One-prompt game dev: GPT-6 Astra plans and codes while Hyper3D Rodin auto-generates every 3D asset — CodeByPoonam · 2026-09-11
- Agentic Trading Lab: An Open-Source Python Library for LLM-Powered Trading Agents — mdancho84 · 2026-09-11
- Recreating a Minimax song with YuE2 via a Hermes agent in pure CLI on a 16GB GPU — wzwowzw0002 · 2026-09-11
- How AI Agents Turn Experience Into Lasting Gains: A Guide to Recursive Self-Improvement — Roger_M_Taylor · 2026-09-11
- Dev torn on Cloudflare Agents SDK: full primitives but vendor lock-in — MikkoH · 2026-09-11
- Team-level AI agents: where should shared context and history live? — Al_Grigor · 2026-09-11