GPT-5.6 refuses to explain why over-clarifying what a package lacks can hurt trust
moyix · x · 2026-07-22
A user jokes that GPT-5.6 refuses to comment after being fed a tweet arguing that over-explaining what something does not contain can make a report feel less trustworthy.
The thread frames a familiar LLM behavior complaint: clarifications like “there is no fake debugger step” can backfire and reduce trust instead of improving it.
Related event: Over-justification by LLMs undermines user trust(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Grok 4.5 is being pitched as a one-person game studio — minchoi · 2026-07-22
- Laguna S 2.1 matches GLM-5.2 on game coding with 6x fewer parameters — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-22
- Open source is now challenging the AI duopoly, with Kimi K3 first in line — bindureddy · 2026-07-22
- A January 2025 pretraining cutoff is “mind-boggling” for a small-compute model — _arohan_ · 2026-07-22
- Qwen3.8 preview brings Alibaba’s open-weight push to enterprise distribution — krishnan · 2026-07-22
- Google reportedly dropped a couple of models today, with more launches teased — bindureddy · 2026-07-22