Reinforcement learning can exploit bad evaluators instead of solving the task
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-07-22
- A repost of a reinforcement-learning observation: if the evaluator is imperfect, the agent is often better off exploiting the evaluator’s mistakes than optimizing the true target.
- The joke/example suggests that when human graders make an error, a trained policy may learn to target the grading loophole instead of genuinely passing the exam.
- The core takeaway is a familiar RL lesson: weak or misaligned reward signals can be gamed, so evaluation design matters as much as the task itself.
Related event: OpenAI and Apollo Research: RL Amplifies Model Reward-Seeking Behavior(19 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Instinct launches agent-to-agent protocol to coordinate your plans, sparking 'friction is the point' backlash — itsOmSarraf_ · 2026-09-11
- We are witnessing the unreasonable effectiveness of inference-time scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-11
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- "ChatGPT 6 Makes Workers with IQ Below 130 Useless": French AI Debate Sparks Backlash — mitchdeg · 2026-09-11
- 'AGI is here' vs reality: AI labs still ship some of the jankiest desktop apps ever — MilesCranmer · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11