Ryan Greenblatt says economists underestimate AI’s growth impact even in a 100 million worker scenario
RyanGreenblatt · x · 2026-07-22
Ryan Greenblatt uses a bar-stool thought experiment to argue that people are underestimating AI’s growth impact. He walks through a scenario where 100 million AI workers are effectively super-human: they match top experts across economically relevant fields, work longer and faster than humans, save almost all of what they earn, and could do substantial cognitive labor.
The punchline is that if economists would call that transformative for human immigrants, they should not suddenly become conservative when the same properties are attached to AIs. The post argues that claims of only 3% annual growth from AI ignore how much bottleneck thinking changes once labor becomes vastly more capable and scalable.
Related event: Vast Disparities in AI Economic Impact Predictions by 2035(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Microsoft's reported 60,000 voluntary exits spark essay asking who AI is really for — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-10-27
- PHP2Shell exploits confirmed in the wild, attackers may use agentic AI for post-exploitation — AravSrinivas · 2026-10-27
- LukeW: Technology Limits Are Temporary — and AI Skeptics Are Already Feeling It — LukeW · 2026-10-27
- GiveDirectly pilots an optional AI chatbot alongside cash aid in Rwanda — NathanpmYoung · 2026-10-27
- Ex-Anthropic employee essay: the org optimizes for power 'constrained by being seen as the good guys' — RichardMCNgo · 2026-10-27
- Investor: model version numbers are a mirage, only datacenter margins are real — StewartalsopIII · 2026-10-27