Kimi K3 Offers Better Cost-Performance for Coding Tasks
rohanpaul_ai · x · 2026-07-19
An image compares the performance of **Kimi K3** and **Fable 5** on software engineering / DeepSWE rollout tasks: - At a cost of $100, Kimi completes **14.7** tasks compared to Fable's **5.3**, giving it a roughly **2.8x** advantage in cost-effectiveness. - The tradeoff is a slower per-rollout time: Kimi takes a median of **66 minutes**, while Fable takes **21 minutes**. - A cited note adds that these results may continue to shift once the model is officially released and widely available.
More from Models
- Claude 20x users report sharply tighter limits and faster quota burn — MarcJSchmidt · 2026-07-21
- Cola launches July, the latest model jokingly billed as “second only to Fable” — oran_ge · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 looks stronger and about 5× cheaper on a frontend dashboard task — OwariDa · 2026-07-21
- Last Week in AI recap: Anthropic’s $65B round, IPO filing, and Microsoft’s MAI push — Last Week in AI · 2026-07-21
- A user says Claude 4.6 felt worse yesterday and asks whether model quality can drift over time — Rahios · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 hits 89.4% peak on software tasks while Fable 5 is slightly steadier — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-21