Kimi K3 Offers Better Cost-Performance for Coding Tasks
rohanpaul_ai · x · 2026-07-19
An image compares the performance of Kimi K3 and Fable 5 on software engineering / DeepSWE rollout tasks:
- At a cost of $100, Kimi completes 14.7 tasks compared to Fable's 5.3, giving it a roughly 2.8x advantage in cost-effectiveness.
- The tradeoff is a slower per-rollout time: Kimi takes a median of 66 minutes, while Fable takes 21 minutes.
- A cited note adds that these results may continue to shift once the model is officially released and widely available.
More from Models
- Developer Building a Unified Leaderboard of All Model Benchmark Scores — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11