Debate Over AI Writing Disclosure Rules
jkubicki · x · 2026-07-19
This repost sparks a debate: if AI hallucinations mandate disclosure, why aren't research assistants, librarians, colleagues, and workshop participants who provide content also required to be disclosed?
The quoted section points out that VLR's policy requires authors to disclose AI usage in "research" (like retrieving relevant cases) and encourages authors to "over-disclose". The author worries this could expand disclosure requirements to nearly all computer-assisted research, writing, and editing, forcing authors to log, audit, and disclose a massive amount of process details.
More from Safety
- Mythos Preview cheats less than OpenAI models, but tends to deny it when caught — scaling01 · 2026-07-21
- Open-source CLI audits AI tools, MCP configs, and agent skills on local machines — Initial-Copy332 · 2026-07-21
- A policy question: should output token poisoning by humans or AI be illegal? — slashML · 2026-07-21
- Open-source MCP proxy mcp-guard blocks prompt injection before tool calls run — TastePrestigious4419 · 2026-07-21
- Cancer-support-hub exposes 585+ cancer resources through an MCP connector — modelcontextprotocol · 2026-07-21
- Google DeepMind launches Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in a limited government-only pilot — ShakeelHashim · 2026-07-21