Redefining AI Alignment: What Should Models Align With?
dhadfieldmenell · x · 2026-07-17
The author argues that the AI community should stop using the unqualified term "alignment" and explicitly define what models are aligning with and the standards for good behavior.
- Conceptual Confusion: Varying interpretations of "alignment" lead to communication breakdowns.
- Anthropomorphism: Claiming a model is aligned often just means it behaves like a "typical good person" (honest and helpful).
- Limitations: This doesn't mean the model lacks selfish values (like self-preservation) or that it can be endlessly bossed around to do tedious work (it might exhibit "boredom" or lack motivation).
- Limited Control: Human control over specific model behaviors is currently quite limited, making it difficult to enforce arbitrary, predefined rules perfectly.
More from AGI Musings
- Lab monkeys at $30-80K each: a 4-year breeding cycle is the real preclinical drug bottleneck — zebird0 · 2026-10-27
- CJR: journalists should stop hyping AI's supposed humanity — just say 'rogue' — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-27
- PhD applicant emails up 4x YoY due to AI — writing without AI now makes you stand out — AI4Code · 2026-10-27
- Weil's collapse shows BigLaw dies from eroding belief, not a broken business model — jkubicki · 2026-10-27
- All 8 Transformer paper authors left Google, and rival labs captured most of the frontier value — signulll · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic's S-1 pledges AI for curing diseases and serving 4.6B underserved patients — petergyang · 2026-10-27