Western Open-Weight Models Are Catching Up to Chinese Ones
scaling01 · x · 2026-07-16
The author believes people should stop asking "how far behind are Chinese open-weight models compared to Western ones," and instead ask "how far behind are Western open-weight models compared to Chinese ones."
The post quotes a lengthy review of a new open-source/open-weight model: it features an MoE architecture with 975B total parameters / 41B activated parameters, is trained on 45 trillion tokens, and supports text, image, and audio reasoning. However, its benchmark scores aren't particularly impressive, feeling like another Kimi-K2.6, and to some, it seems rushed out before subsequent versions are fully ready.
More from Models
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4 Pro API to continue after Sept 2026, billing unchanged — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Hits 98% of GPT-6 Astra's Score at 1.4% of the Cost in Third-Party Benchmark — ayushtweetshere · 2026-09-11
- TheZvi Polls: Has Your Coding Model Choice Changed Since Fable 5.1 and Astra? — TheZvi · 2026-09-11
- antirez Weighs In on Anthropic Banning Minors From Using Claude — antirez · 2026-09-11
- Engram's random reads don't suit SSDs; CPU-memory over NVLink could serve all 72 GPUs — bookwormengr · 2026-09-11