How to Verify if an AI Agent Actually Did the Job
OgnjenAdzic · reddit · 2026-07-15
The author highlights an easily overlooked issue: a successful tool call does not mean the user's goal was actually achieved.
They give examples of failure modes when an agent handles tasks like subscriptions, scheduling, or messaging:
- Choosing the wrong action, but the API returns success
- Executing repeatedly after a timeout
- Stopping halfway through completion
- Reporting success, but the product state is actually incorrect
They argue that standard API testing only verifies the interface itself, and agent evals don't necessarily cover real-world outcomes. Therefore, they want to know how the industry tests "end-to-end completion." They are particularly interested in:
- Whether the final state is validated independently
- Or if teams mainly rely on traces, logs, and the agent's self-reported results
- How to catch those "looks successful, but actually failed" cases
Related event: AI agents in production: don’t trust narration, verify outcomes(8 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Inspired by OpenAI's 10,000-agent run, dev open-sources a crowdsourced agent problem-solving platform — Benjaminsen · 2026-09-11
- Lucid: open-source Mac app keeps your laptop awake only while AI agents run — Pitiful_Hedgehog_600 · 2026-09-11
- banteg's snail project crowdsources AI agents to finish matching Snail Mail's 20 remaining functions — banteg · 2026-09-11
- Alex Townsend posts 200 open problems in numerical linear algebra for humans and AI agents — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11