Supplementary Link to Prior Paper
ValerioCapraro · x · 2026-07-15
This is a reply to the previous post, primarily adding a link to the paper and reiterating the core conclusion: the PNAS study on "whether logical reasoning requires language" still concludes that **language networks are not a necessary condition for formal reasoning**. Since it covers the same event as the previous post but with less information, it is treated as a supplementary post.
Related event: PNAS Study: Logical Reasoning Does Not Rely on Natural Language(2 posts)→
More from Research
- GigaChat Audio targets long-form audio grounding with timestamps across 120-minute inputs — ai-sage · 2026-07-21
- Paper models Transformer components as stochastic geometry and tests five architectures — Zhihua Liang · 2026-07-21
- LTX 2.3 LoRA demo changes a video’s camera angle — CQDSN · 2026-07-21
- OpenForecaster uses daily news to improve language-model forecasting — Cohere_Labs · 2026-07-21
- Baseten study finds new facts in LLM weights are fragile unless trained from many restatements — alex_verem · 2026-07-21
- uv-scripts/ocr returns to the top of Hugging Face datasets with a JSON model picker — vanstriendaniel · 2026-07-21