LLM's Future Hinges on Post-Training and Proprietary Models
RihardJarc · x · 2026-07-15
A former LLM lab employee shared insights on the future of LLM usage and the growing importance of post-training:
- Application/product companies and model providers are converging; long-term, product companies will likely train their own models.
- Training cost structures have shifted: pre-training previously accounted for roughly 80% and post-training 20%, but the split is now closer to 50/50, encouraging more companies to pursue pre-training.
- Relying solely on private user data as a moat is overestimated; data reflecting real-world usage patterns is far more valuable.
- App companies without proprietary models will be increasingly dependent on closed-source model vendors, as it's easier for model companies to build products than vice versa.
- The future will rely heavily on prompt routing to various models, with smaller, cheaper models handling many tasks instead of defaulting to frontier models.
More from Companies & People
- A post says AI teams should drop the research scientist vs engineer split — jsuarez · 2026-07-22
- YC startup Vendo launches an open-source customization layer for user-built micro-apps — ycombinator · 2026-07-22
- Prescience launches publicly as an AI-native health insurance company — ycombinator · 2026-07-22
- SF AI crowd swaps poker for a bullet and bughouse chess night — Jackyhuang · 2026-07-22
- Polymarket puts Anthropic’s year-end IPO odds at 64% amid patent suit — Polymarket · 2026-07-22
- University of Tennessee sues Anthropic over machine learning and neuromorphic patents — Polymarket · 2026-07-22