Sol is More Stable, Fable is More Expensive
ZainHasan6 · x · 2026-07-15
This adds a comparison of reliability and pricing between Sol and Fable.
Reliability
- Across 26 early configurations, no model exceeded 80% reliability
- Sol peaked at 84.3%, achieving a 4/4 pass rate on 61 tasks
- Fable peaked higher at 88%, compared to Sol's 85.8%, creating more "magic moments"
Cost
- Sol high: $3.47/rollout
- Fable xhigh: $13.41/rollout
- This means Sol costs roughly 1/4 as much, yet achieves similar or even better cost-effectiveness under certain configurations
The author concludes: Fable is stronger but more expensive, while Sol is cheaper and more stable.
Related event: Sol vs Fable: Coding Agent Benchmarks Show Specialization, Not Dominance(9 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Devin adds e2b sandboxes for remote agent execution — badphilosopher · 2026-07-22
- Hermes Agent Refactoring Proposal: Decoupling via Event Bus and Monorepo Slicing — Promptmethus · 2026-07-22
- ty now reads Pydantic config keywords and field metadata — charliermarsh · 2026-07-22
- Pensar Launches AI Security Agent to Autonomously Discover and Patch 0-Days — andriy_mulyar · 2026-07-22
- ty adds first-class Pydantic support, including strict and lax field handling — charliermarsh · 2026-07-22
- Google launches Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber for CodeMender, with limited access for governments — GoogleAI · 2026-07-22