Evaluating Small Models: Multiple-Choice Tests Are Easy to Game
mervenoyann · x · 2026-07-14
AI researcher Merve Noyant points out that when evaluating large models, most multiple-choice question assessments (MCQA) actually make it easy for models to "cheat": even if a model gets stuck in a loop or hallucinates, the structure of the multiple-choice options helps it organize and anchor the correct answer. Consequently, she prefers researching small models and emphasizes the importance of conducting "vibe tests."
Related event: Multiple-Choice Evaluations May Overestimate LLMs(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Open ECDSA.fail challenge uses AI agents to shrink Shor's-algorithm quantum circuits for Bitcoin keys — StefanoGogioso · 2026-09-11
- Alex Townsend posts 200 open problems in numerical linear algebra for humans and AI agents — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- Navier-Stokes, Riemann, P vs NP: what this week's math buzzwords mean for you — koltregaskes · 2026-09-11
- Fruit fly brain as an LLM: connectome-driven language model demo goes live — ngxson · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11
- The Waymo effect: how AI is quietly making research less collaborative — JohnHammersley · 2026-09-11