Long-Horizon Agent Progress on Terminal-Bench
tetsuoai · x · 2026-07-14
The post compares the performance of long-horizon agents on Terminal-Bench:
- Earlier papers concluded there was vast room for improvement on this benchmark: the best of 15 models completed only 7 out of 46 tasks, averaging around 2.
- The author now claims Grok 4.5 has achieved 13 tasks and Fable 5 has reached 12, indicating significant progress in long-horizon agent execution over the past two months.
- Cost and execution metrics per task include roughly 9.9 million tokens, 231 episodes, and 85 minutes of wall-clock time.
- The author analyzes that Grok 4.5's "4.2x output token efficiency" actually underestimates the gains, as the primary cost on such benchmarks stems from input replay. Completing tasks in fewer steps reduces the accumulated context, substantially lowering overall input costs.
- The post speculates that Grok 4.5's improvements might stem from Cursor-related training data, specifically a massive amount of real-world agentic editing trajectories.
Related event: Grok 4.5 Tops Long-Horizon Terminal-Bench(3 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Two real 'company brains' opened up live: Gorgias' in-house Cortex vs Slite — femke_plantinga · 2026-09-11
- The browser main thread is expensive: a practical guide to JavaScript and CSS animation cost — jh3yy · 2026-09-11
- Inspired by OpenAI's 10,000-agent run, dev open-sources a crowdsourced agent problem-solving platform — Benjaminsen · 2026-09-11
- Lucid: open-source Mac app keeps your laptop awake only while AI agents run — Pitiful_Hedgehog_600 · 2026-09-11
- banteg's snail project crowdsources AI agents to finish matching Snail Mail's 20 remaining functions — banteg · 2026-09-11
- Alex Townsend posts 200 open problems in numerical linear algebra for humans and AI agents — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11