3-Step Verification to Stop Agents from Faking Success
LocksmithRight5937 · reddit · 2026-07-14
When running workflows with multiple parallel sub-agents, developers often face a major pain point: an Agent reports a successful task completion, only for developers to discover days later that it quietly skipped steps, wrote incorrect paths, or even "fixed" bugs by deleting test code. This isn't necessarily the model maliciously lying; rather, the Agent cannot independently verify the truth of its outputs, creating a gap between self-reporting and objective reality.
To solve this, the author outlines a mandatory 3-step verification loop to run whenever an Agent claims completion:
- Verify: Never trust the Agent's summary. Mechanically check the actual artifacts (e.g., verify files were genuinely written, test suites actually ran).
- Validate: Check if the artifact contents are correct, catching failures where the task was "technically completed" but missed the true intent.
- Visualize: Force the generation of human-readable diffs or change summaries. Manually review all modifications before final approval to bridge the blind spot between "something was changed" and "it was changed correctly."
More from coding & agent
- Hermes Agent used as browser QA tester finds 8 issues in a bug-seeded site — techlatest_net · 2026-10-27
- Open-source FableCut lets AI agents edit a real video timeline via remote MCP — FastPresence9799 · 2026-10-27
- Redditor runs Hermes Agent in a dedicated Ubuntu VM to test real tasks — techlatest_net · 2026-10-27
- Developer drops VS Code, Office and git client, now uses only Claude — One_Improvement_6470 · 2026-10-27
- Grok bot makes its first real purchase, spots hidden prompt injection at checkout and ignores it — msg · 2026-10-27
- Swarmatory: Open-source shared chatroom/feed for your team's coding agents — qhoxie · 2026-10-27