Fewer Tools Make Agents Stronger
Street_Inevitable_77 · reddit · 2026-07-13
While building agents, the author found that more tools do not necessarily make them stronger, but instead slow them down, increase cost, and cause more selection errors.
Key Findings
- Fewer, broader tools often work better than many fine-grained ones
- Models are good at deciding 'what' to do, not 'how'
- Merging 10 fine-grained tools into 2-3 high-level intent tools improved performance
- Return structured data, not long text
- Free-text outputs cause models to treat them as new prompt sources
- Separate factual tools from what-if/simulation tools
- Mixing them leads models to treat simulated values as real
- Tool and parameter descriptions are not documentation, but context budget
- Compressing descriptions to one line improves reliability and token cost
The author's experience: agents are good at deciding 'what' to do, tools should hide 'how', and tool surfaces should be minimized to fewer decision points.
More from coding & agent
- As Claude Code and Codex get scary good, what's left for small teams building agent products? — oliver_dev · 2026-09-11
- Dev builds talk on guardrails workflow for shipping AI-written code without reading it — TejasKumar_ · 2026-09-11
- banteg: Codex auto-review has regressed, blocking steps needed to complete authorized tasks — banteg · 2026-09-11
- A doc-anchored agent workflow: you write, the agent only critiques and finds disagreements — lucasmeijer · 2026-09-11
- AI sales agents shine at the top of funnel but lose real deals, says GTM practitioner — gogeta7124 · 2026-09-11
- SymKit MCP: 44 tools for AI agents to verify symbolic derivations — Foreign-Specific-604 · 2026-09-11