Models Still Have a Massive Gap in Math
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-07-12
This repost discusses the capability gaps among different models in specific domains:
- The capability chasm remains vast in certain crucial areas
- For example, when having GPT 5.6 write proofs, it performs significantly better than Fable
- This raises a question: what training differences cause the GPT series to be noticeably stronger at math?
The core focus here is comparing model capabilities, not discussing products or workflows.
More from Models
- Grok 4.5 is now free inside Cursor, the popular AI coding IDE — mark_k · 2026-07-21
- Eno Reyes says model distillation is basically unstoppable — LangChain · 2026-07-21
- Sakana says multiple diffusion models plus MCTS beat test-time scaling on coding and math — SakanaAILabs · 2026-07-21
- OpenAI hackathon project stalls as Codex struggles on voice, while Claude spots the issue — ColleenMBrady · 2026-07-21
- Kimi K3 lands exactly on China’s 2-year AI capability trend line — peterwildeford · 2026-07-21
- Google’s Gemini 3.6 Flash is pitched as its most intelligent model for coding and agentic work — scaling01 · 2026-07-21