Comparing How Two Models Interpret Doodles
goodside · x · 2026-07-12
The author fed a meaningless doodle—literally just random scribbling with eyes closed on a phone screen—into GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5. The results:
- Sol tends to confidently fabricate an answer, displaying hallucination tendencies.
- Fable directly admits it cannot read the text and even points out that it doesn't look like writing at all.
This is a classic showcase of how differently models react to ambiguous inputs.
Related event: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5 Doodle Test Sparks Hallucination Debate(5 posts)→
More from Fun
- Nathan Lambert responds to curiosity about his background with a selfie: 'Not in SF' — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- SMBC comic: chicken nuggets as 'a tacit covenant restated every time I supply you' — rickasaurus · 2026-10-27
- Viral shitpost: hackers pwned my iPhone, my router runs on zero-point energy — ctjlewis · 2026-10-27
- Inference is just Kubernetes with a multi-trillion-dollar market, and the communities overlap — matt_slotnick · 2026-10-27
- yetone posts an AI-written 'autopsy report and apology' for the magpie gateway outage — lxfater · 2026-10-27
- "XiaoBi's NBA Dream": a bunny's basketball career lasts exactly 3 seconds — ComprehensiveWin7619 · 2026-10-27