Bad Judges Can Fool Consistency Metrics
sanmikoyejo · x · 2026-07-12
A forwarded thread mentions that a deliberately flawed judge can still achieve a human Spearman score of around 0.45, but fails the weak monotonicity test (12.5%). This indicates that simply looking at human consistency is not enough to detect certain systematic failure modes.
More from Research
- Causal-only attention for non-generative tasks is wasteful, argues HF engineer — antoine_chaffin · 2026-09-11
- Catholic University of Chile researcher: scaling AI feedback is key to sustainable medical education — julianvarascom · 2026-09-11
- Nature paper images cellular activity across all organs, revealing body-wide circuits — arjunrajlab · 2026-09-11
- SignNet 1M Dataset Released for Sign Language Research — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- ECCV26 Oral: Flow Matching Enables Single-Stage Multi-View Point Cloud Registration — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- InFlux++ Method Released — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11