Bad Judges Can Fool Consistency Metrics
sanmikoyejo · x · 2026-07-12
A forwarded thread mentions that a deliberately flawed judge can still achieve a human Spearman score of around 0.45, but fails the weak monotonicity test (12.5%). This indicates that simply looking at human consistency is not enough to detect certain systematic failure modes.
More from Research
- VidMap uses RoMa coarse matching on all frames, fine-scale only for keyframes — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Bug Hunt Bench author: leaderboard noise is about 2-3 points — PawelHuryn · 2026-09-11
- Bug Hunt Bench ranks frontier coding models on 105 planted real-repo bugs — PawelHuryn · 2026-09-11
- PNAS paper shows a tiny billiard-ball system is a universal computer — undecidability lives in two dimensions — eigensteve · 2026-09-11
- New paper: Absolute pose estimation from affine cues and gravity direction — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- LoMa Paper Ships REALLY HardPairs Dataset, Accepted at ECCV 2026 — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11