Sonnet 5 Costs More for Long Coding Tasks
shricodev · reddit · 2026-07-11
The author tested Claude Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 on two coding tasks: adding a RAG debugger in Open WebUI, and building a browser-based Clash Royale-style game. Results show Sonnet isn't necessarily cheaper for long tasks:
- RAG debugger: Sonnet took longer but cost slightly less overall; Fable was faster and the implementation was more to the author's liking.
- Game project: Fable worked in one shot, included tests, and used Playwright for UI checks; Sonnet produced a usable appearance but had more initial issues, requiring multiple rounds of fixes, ultimately costing more time and money.
The author's conclusion: Cheaper per token doesn't mean cheaper per task completed. Sonnet 5 is significantly better than 4.6 in frontend and tool use, but token consumption and total cost can escalate quickly on complex long coding tasks.
More from coding & agent
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- Investment Analyst Asks How to Build a Claude-Based Diligence Agent Stack — Careless_Tie2286 · 2026-09-11
- How Do You Catch Behavioral Regressions in LLM Agents Between Releases? — Beautiful_Belt_601 · 2026-09-11
- Treating agents like 50 First Dates: a 3-layer context system so every conversation doesn't start from zero — evielync · 2026-09-11
- Running the Firefox MCP on Android via Termux, ngrok, and mcp-proxy — Nervous-Strain7544 · 2026-09-11
- Run Firefox MCP on Android: Termux + ngrok tunnel tutorial — Nervous-Strain7544 · 2026-09-11