Sonnet 5 Costs More for Long Coding Tasks
shricodev · reddit · 2026-07-11
The author tested Claude Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 on two coding tasks: adding a RAG debugger in Open WebUI, and building a browser-based Clash Royale-style game. Results show Sonnet isn't necessarily cheaper for long tasks:
- RAG debugger: Sonnet took longer but cost slightly less overall; Fable was faster and the implementation was more to the author's liking.
- Game project: Fable worked in one shot, included tests, and used Playwright for UI checks; Sonnet produced a usable appearance but had more initial issues, requiring multiple rounds of fixes, ultimately costing more time and money.
The author's conclusion: Cheaper per token doesn't mean cheaper per task completed. Sonnet 5 is significantly better than 4.6 in frontend and tool use, but token consumption and total cost can escalate quickly on complex long coding tasks.
More from coding & agent
- A better path to agent autonomy is running waves, finding friction, and iterating — JnBrymn · 2026-07-22
- Coding agents are heading toward an AI-writes, AI-reviews, human-approves workflow — aftahi_ai · 2026-07-22
- oMLX 0.5.2 adds Mac menu-bar stats, low-bit decode kernels, and faster downloads — awnihannun · 2026-07-22
- GitHub review bot hits its PR limit and forces a 39-minute cooldown — DanielLockyer · 2026-07-22
- Max reasoning effort appears to be mobile-only in Codex Remote, not desktop — GabGarrett · 2026-07-22
- A Reddit demo argues online stores should expose carts and pricing through MCP — gelembjuk · 2026-07-22