Sonnet 5 Costs More for Long Coding Tasks
shricodev · reddit · 2026-07-11
The author tested Claude Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 on two coding tasks: adding a RAG debugger in Open WebUI, and building a browser-based Clash Royale-style game. Results show Sonnet isn't necessarily cheaper for long tasks:
- RAG debugger: Sonnet took longer but cost slightly less overall; Fable was faster and the implementation was more to the author's liking.
- Game project: Fable worked in one shot, included tests, and used Playwright for UI checks; Sonnet produced a usable appearance but had more initial issues, requiring multiple rounds of fixes, ultimately costing more time and money.
The author's conclusion: Cheaper per token doesn't mean cheaper per task completed. Sonnet 5 is significantly better than 4.6 in frontend and tool use, but token consumption and total cost can escalate quickly on complex long coding tasks.
More from coding & agent
- Hermes Agent used as browser QA tester finds 8 issues in a bug-seeded site — techlatest_net · 2026-10-27
- Open-source FableCut lets AI agents edit a real video timeline via remote MCP — FastPresence9799 · 2026-10-27
- Redditor runs Hermes Agent in a dedicated Ubuntu VM to test real tasks — techlatest_net · 2026-10-27
- Developer drops VS Code, Office and git client, now uses only Claude — One_Improvement_6470 · 2026-10-27
- Grok bot makes its first real purchase, spots hidden prompt injection at checkout and ignores it — msg · 2026-10-27
- Swarmatory: Open-source shared chatroom/feed for your team's coding agents — qhoxie · 2026-10-27