Muse Spark 1.1 Beats GLM-5.2 in Coding Eval
The Decoder · rss · 2026-07-11
The Decoder reports that Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 scored 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, marking an 8-point improvement in just three months.
Key data points from the report include:
- For coding tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 scored 71.3, slightly outperforming GLM-5.2.
- The cost per task is approximately $0.26, making it cheaper than its counterparts.
- The hallucination rate dropped from 73% to 38%.
The core takeaway is that the model has made solid progress in coding ability, cost efficiency, and hallucination control.
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11