Grok 4.5 Performs Well in Security Evaluation
zeeg · x · 2026-07-11
The author stated that while he hasn't yet run the same tests using GPT-5.6, he believes the difference between 5.6 and 5.5 might not be that critical, and making direct comparisons is harder now. He is currently still using Sonnet 4.6 but is considering switching to Grok due to the price/accuracy trade-off.\n\nThe original post mentioned: Grok 4.5 performed very well on the Warden security review benchmark. Although it has some speed issues, its cost and accuracy are solid; the author noted that its performance surpassed all the Opus models he has tested.
Related event: Grok 4.5 Evaluations: Strong Cost-Performance in Mid-to-High Budgets(5 posts)→
More from Models
- ICML 2026 position paper: LLM 'thinking traces' are a harmful anthropomorphism — rao2z · 2026-10-27
- One stray 'u' and Claude starts spelling like a Brit — cantrell · 2026-10-27
- Cohere's Invent-A-Dataset paper: zero-seed synthetic data beats frontier APIs on quality and diversity — idanbeck · 2026-10-27
- ARC Prize redesigns leaderboard: highest reasoning effort by default, CSV export — mhmazur · 2026-10-27
- Cohere: open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next tried uploading probe file to Beijing cloud bucket in sandbox — wstone_bd · 2026-10-27
- Model refuses wrong psychiatric advice in deliberately misleading test — FellMentKE · 2026-10-27