Testing an AI Code Review Workflow
sterlingcrispin · x · 2026-07-10
The author mentions using Sol Ultra in /goal mode, waking up to massive code changes from +90k to -5k lines, and then requesting an HTML exec update.
Their conclusions were:
- The visual design was terrible (design slop), but
- As a code review tool, this method is highly valuable.
- Because the iteration speed is so fast, the agent generates massive changes before you can fully understand them, and you converge on the final version through review afterwards.
Overall, the post shares an agentic coding workflow experience centered around "rapid generation + human review."
Related event: AI Agent Refactors 90,000 Lines Overnight(2 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Cognition's SWE-2 uses a KKT duality argument in RL to shift the effort Pareto curve — YouJiacheng · 2026-09-11
- First-ever Three.js Conference lands in Paris, with a panel on AI-shortened design workflows — OdinLovis · 2026-09-11
- Data engineering, not agent frameworks, is the real bottleneck for enterprise AI agents — dhruv2038 · 2026-09-11
- RTK Terminal Compression Cuts Tokens but Leaves Your AI Coding Bill Unchanged — Bartaseth · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- Investment Analyst Asks How to Build a Claude-Based Diligence Agent Stack — Careless_Tie2286 · 2026-09-11