ChatGPT and Claude Fail to Solve Math Proof Independently
2prime_PKU · x · 2026-07-07
Even when provided with the correct Harrison-Reiman subclass and key papers, ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and Claude Opus 4.8 failed completely to solve this mathematical proof independently in fresh conversations. This is the core conclusion of a Peking University research series: current cutting-edge frontier models still have a fundamental gap in hardcore mathematical reasoning, making human-AI collaboration a more realistic path than independent AI operation.
More from Models
- Meta's Muse Spark 1.3 System Card Relies on Four Tübingen Benchmarks — maksym_andr · 2026-10-27
- ChatGPT Pro 500 Spotted: £445/Month Tier With Shared Weekly Usage Limits — yoimnotkesku · 2026-10-27
- Experts Clash: Today's Models Dwarf GPT-4, But Journal Delays Lock Out New LLMs — DeryaTR_ · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI's Terra release disappoints: community senses a widening lab-to-public frontier gap — ChrisGPT · 2026-10-27
- Claude spots broken physics in AI videos, fixes them with CFD and finite-element verification — OfirPress · 2026-10-27
- Meta TBD underwent pre-launch red-teaming by 5 third-party safety firms — maksym_andr · 2026-10-27