Experts Clash: Today's Models Dwarf GPT-4, But Journal Delays Lock Out New LLMs
DeryaTR_ · x · 2026-10-27
Derya Unutmaz disagrees with Eric Topol: current models are vastly better than the three-year-old GPT-4 he found cited in a paper. He notes peer-review delays mean journals can't feature latest-model studies — preprints are the only viable route.
More from AGI Musings
- Pop psychology myths about mental disorders were largely invented online to dehumanize patients — AndyMasley · 2026-10-27
- Eric Topol challenges frontier-model study: where's proof of sustained upskilling? — EricTopol · 2026-10-27
- Pedro Domingos: as intelligence gets cheap, demand will skyrocket — pmddomingos · 2026-10-27
- Apollo chief economist: AI has delivered zero financial payoff outside Big Tech — rseroter · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI acquires Orchestra Bio to bring clinical-trial monitoring agents into drug development — dl_weekly · 2026-10-27
- Do AI agents work better when they pace themselves and take breaks? — EpistemicHope · 2026-10-27