AI Safety Research Isn't Closed: GDM and Other Labs Have Long Had Interdisciplinary Teams
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-07-06
The author pushes back against criticisms that AI safety labs are closed off, arguing that the field is actually quite open and encouraging readers to engage with lab researchers or join them to see for themselves. Using Google DeepMind as an example, the author notes that they have been hiring philosophers, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists for over a decade, publishing a vast amount of interdisciplinary research on AGI risks, safety, and consciousness.
Related event: AI Safety Research Defended: GDM's Long-Standing Interdisciplinary Teams(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Musk says AI is unstoppable, and one long post turns that into an abundance thesis — r0ck3t23 · 2026-07-27
- Spanish post recommends an AI guide for students focused on sycophancy and workslop — leslysandra · 2026-07-27
- A new AI book frames the path from learning to controlling AI — leslysandra · 2026-07-27
- For many users, the real ChatGPT question is trust, not token limits — petergyang · 2026-07-27
- ARC AGI 3 should have stayed private, with no examples or public dataset — flowersslop · 2026-07-27
- AI makes knowledge cheaper, but judgment remains the scarce skill — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-07-27