Why Models Hallucinate Instead of Admitting Ignorance: Benchmarks Reward Correctness, Not Honesty
ziv_ravid · x · 2026-07-04
The authors of the "Mirage" research explain why models tend to hallucinate rather than admit "I can't tell": it's shaped by evaluation mechanisms. Existing benchmarks only reward correct answers, not whether they are grounded. Thus, guessing based on priors has a positive expected return, while skipping yields zero—making hallucination the optimal strategy under current evaluation systems.
More from Research
- New paper: Absolute pose estimation from affine cues and gravity direction — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- LoMa Paper Ships REALLY HardPairs Dataset, Accepted at ECCV 2026 — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Johns Hopkins Launches Full-Stack Hands-on Robot Learning Class with SO-101 Arm Kits — _krishna_murthy · 2026-09-11
- SyncWorld: In-Context Robot World Model Simulates Unseen Views and Embodiments Zero-Shot — ChongZzZhang · 2026-09-11
- A 3D Pose Dataset for Dogs Released — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Five tells that still make AI video read as AI, from physics glitches to missing operators — NewPhoneWhotiz · 2026-09-11