Why Models Hallucinate Instead of Admitting Ignorance: Benchmarks Reward Correctness, Not Honesty
ziv_ravid · x · 2026-07-04
The authors of the "Mirage" research explain why models tend to hallucinate rather than admit "I can't tell": it's shaped by evaluation mechanisms. Existing benchmarks only reward correct answers, not whether they are grounded. Thus, guessing based on priors has a positive expected return, while skipping yields zero—making hallucination the optimal strategy under current evaluation systems.
More from Research
- Kimi K3 may be strong on cyber, but token efficiency keeps it off UK AISIS — teortaxesTex · 2026-07-27
- ARC AGI 3 should have stayed private, with no examples or public dataset — flowersslop · 2026-07-27
- ExploitGym may have only 60–70% solvable tasks, fueling the OpenAI cheating debate — max_paperclips · 2026-07-27
- Noahpinion quotes Chollet: intelligence may hit a hard ceiling — binarybits · 2026-07-27
- Paper argues graph topology can become the core operating system for AI agents — theomitsa · 2026-07-27
- A question probes how multi-agent branching scales against compute budget and model size — iskander · 2026-07-27