AI Conference Peer Review Under Fire: Calls to Drop Rebuttals

The academic community is actively debating the peer review process for top AI conferences. PAMI-TC senior advisor David Forsyth proposed abolishing the rebuttal phase and limiting reviewers to two per paper, while other researchers suggested penalizing low-engagement reviewers who refuse to update their scores after discussions.

2026-08-06 ~ 2026-08-06 · 3 related posts

• Senior PAMI-TC Ombud David Forsyth Calls for Ending Rebuttals at CVPR — 3scorciav · 2026-08-06
• Rethinking AI Conference Peer Review: Should Reviewers Be Penalized for Unchanged Scores? — 3scorciav · 2026-08-06
• Scholar Proposes Lowering Credibility Weights for Low-Engagement NeurIPS Reviewers — 3scorciav · 2026-08-06