DeepSeek-V4-Flash Local Deployment Benchmarks: Performance Across Hardware
Following the release of DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, the community quickly initiated local deployment tests across various configurations, ranging from consumer-grade GPUs to DGX Spark. Performance varied significantly: a single RTX 3090 achieved only 4.02 tok/s in an unoptimized environment, while dual RTX PRO 6000 reached 243 tok/s using speculative decoding. Factors like quantization methods, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and software stacks (such as vLLM and llama.cpp) all impacted the final results. These hands-on tests provide a hardware selection reference for users with different budgets and needs, demonstrating the feasibility of running open-source models on personal hardware.
已确认
- 多款消费级显卡可运行 DeepSeek-V4-Flash:RTX 3090(单卡 4.02 tok/s,双卡 12.5 tok/s)、双 RTX 3060(速度未明确)、3×RTX 3090(119GB 占用)、5 卡混插(PP 600 t/s)等。
- AMD 显卡同样可行:3×MI50 达 15 t/s,混合 7900 XTX + 3×MI60 为 11 t/s。
- DGX Spark 表现突出:单机 16.5 tok/s(3bit 量化),双机 82 tok/s(单流,峰值 95),并发 3 会话 135 tok/s。
- 投机解码显著提速:双 RTX PRO 6000 上从 243 tok/s(投机)对比无投机提升明显。
- 上下文长度受显存限制:双 RTX PRO 6000 最高 131K,但滑动窗口注意力可支持百万上下文(m16)。
尚未确认
- 部分性能数据来自单一测试,未复现,如 m14 的 243 tok/s 需进一步验证。
- m9 中 DGX Spark 单机 agentic 工作流性能反超双卡 vLLM 的结论,依赖特定测试场景,普适性未知。
为什么重要
这些实测表明,DeepSeek-V4-Flash 在多种硬件上均可本地运行,性能足以满足个人或小团队使用,降低了前沿模型的门槛。同时,投机解码、量化等优化手段可大幅提升效率,为本地 AI 部署提供了实践参考。
2026-08-01 ~ 2026-08-03 · 21 related posts
Primary sources
- Local LLM on Mac: M2 Ultra 192GB Long-Context Inference Benchmarks — Badger-Purple ·
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash on RTX 3090 with 128GB RAM: 12.5 tok/s via --n-cpu-moe — Ok_Ninja7526 ·
- DeepSeek-V4 Local Test: 17 t/s on A6000 + 256GB RAM — USBhost ·
- Running DeepSeek V4 on a Single Unoptimized RTX 3090: 4 Tokens/sec — Altruistic_Heat_9531 · 2026-08-01
- DeepSeek Hits 243 tok/s on Dual RTX 6000 with Speculative Decoding — TheZachMueller · 2026-08-02
- DeepSeek v4 Flash Hits 82 tok/s on Dual DGX Sparks — andrewchen · 2026-08-02
- Benchmarking DeepSeek on Dual RTX 3060 with 96GB RAM: Speed and Cost Analysis — esw123 · 2026-08-02
- Multi-GPU Full VRAM Deployment of DeepSeek V4 Yields Only 600 t/s PP — fragment_me · 2026-08-02
- Running DeepSeek V4-Flash Locally: Dual RTX 6000 Rig Handles Only Single User — dee_hw · 2026-08-02
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 3-bit Quantization Tested on 3x RTX 3090: 119GB VRAM — consultkitapp · 2026-08-02
- DeepSeek's New Release Significantly Boosts the Value of Nvidia DGX Spark — firstadopter · 2026-08-02
- [source] DeepSeek-V4-Flash on RTX 3090 with 128GB RAM: 12.5 tok/s via --n-cpu-moe — Ok_Ninja7526 · 2026-08-02
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash hits 44-59.5 tok/s on RTX PRO 6000 eGPU with llama.cpp — backslashHH · 2026-08-02
- Custom IQ3 Requant for DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1.4x Decode Speed on Mixed-GPU Rigs — HockeyDadNinja · 2026-08-02
- Running DeepSeek V4 Locally on 3x MI50: Hits 15 t/s — Kamal965 · 2026-08-02
- DeepSeek v4 Flash on Single DGX Spark Beats Dual-Spark Setup in Agentic Workflows — pbaylies · 2026-08-02
- [source] DeepSeek-V4 Local Test: 17 t/s on A6000 + 256GB RAM — USBhost · 2026-08-02
- Running Frontier Models Locally: DeepSeek V4 Flash on 2x DGX Sparks — lifebypixels · 2026-08-02
- Running DeepSeek V4-Flash with 1M Context on 2x RTX PRO 6000: Concurrency Up 1.5x — dee_hw · 2026-08-02
- Running LLMs on mixed AMD GPUs: 11 t/s inference speed achieved — Hyungsun · 2026-08-02
- Running Agentic Coding on Two DGX Sparks: 100M Tokens/Day Economics — HarveenChadha · 2026-08-02
- [source] Local LLM on Mac: M2 Ultra 192GB Long-Context Inference Benchmarks — Badger-Purple · 2026-08-02
- Running DeepSeek V4 Flash 155G on DGX Spark: 2-bit Quantization & MTP Benchmarks — Puzzleheaded_Base302 · 2026-08-03
- Running LLMs on DGX Spark: DeepSeek V4 Flash Tops the Ranking — andersonbcdefg · 2026-08-03