FULL STORY

StepFun's Step 5 Preview: Surprise Launch, Early Benchmarks

StepFun surprised the industry with Step 5 Preview, a 600B-parameter flagship touting cost-performance. Early benchmarks scored it 44, highlighting strong value but weak agent capabilities.

2026-09-21 ~ 2026-09-22 · 2 episodes · 10 posts

Episode 1 · StepFun Surprises with Step 5 Preview, Touting Cost-Performance Frontier (2026-09-21, 4 posts)

StepFun unexpectedly released flagship model Step 5 Preview (600B total, 27B active parameters), claiming to advance the cost-performance frontier. Early testers found it competitive with GLM and Kimi flagships in coding agent tasks, though some noted weaknesses in generalization and long-horizon tasks.

Episode 2 · Artificial Analysis Reviews Step 5 Preview: 44 Points at 1/2.8 the Cost (2026-09-22, 6 posts)

On Sep 22, Artificial Analysis published its full evaluation of StepFun's new flagship Step 5 Preview: an Intelligence Index of 44, tying Kimi K3 (max), slightly below GLM-5.3 (max, 45) and Qwen3.8 Max, ranking 26th among 202 models. It is a flagship whose biggest selling point is aggressive pricing, with leading reasoning but weak agent capabilities.

Confirmed

  • Specs and score: 600B total / 27B active parameters; Intelligence Index 44, ranked 26th; output speed 92.8 tokens/s (above the 71 average); pricing $1/$2.70 per million tokens, both below the median.
  • Reasoning vs agents: reasoning is strong, but agent tasks are a clear weakness — GDPval-AA 1,566 Elo, AA-Briefcase 1,4xx (full figure not given in the posts).
  • Knowledge and hallucination: 42% on AA-Omniscience, beating GLM-5.3 (max, 753B, 34%) and slightly above the recall trend line for its parameter count; 43% of its answers exhibit hallucination.
  • Cost advantage: about $0.72 per Intelligence Index task versus $2.00 for Kimi K3 (max) at the same score; Artificial Analysis notes it beats the cost line via pricing rather than token efficiency, at roughly 1/2.8 the cost of peers.

Why it matters

Step 5 Preview charts a differentiated path: competing on price-performance — 44 points at about 1/2.8 the per-task cost — rather than absolute scores. Its 43% hallucination rate and agent weaknesses call for caution in high-reliability automation scenarios.