Turning newsletter edits into AI checks lifts frontier models 25+ points on summaries

danshipper · x · 2026-11-16

Dan Shipper of Every describes a workflow for encoding editorial taste into evaluable AI checks: real Context Window drafts are saved alongside his actual edits and reactions in Every Checks, with each draft-vs-gold-case difference converted into a binary yes/no check. Eight real cases yielded 74 checks defining what good writing looks like.

The team then built a reusable short-idea-summary skill and iterated it from v1 to v9, testing each version in isolated zero-context sandboxes across four frontier models (Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Sonnet 5.5, all High effort), blind-graded by claude-sonnet-5-5 against the 74 checks.

Takeaway: collect gold cases, turn their differences from mediocre drafts into checks, then optimize a skill against those checks—turning daily editorial feedback into a compounding asset applicable to any quality-critical writing task.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →