LessWrong's 'The Case for MAPLE' goes viral: 13,346 more words before the argument starts

AaronBergman18 · x · 2026-11-16

A LessWrong post titled "The Case for MAPLE" is going viral for its audacious structure: after hinting that MAPLE was criticized as "high-co..." and is "doing something fundamental...", it tells readers to "read 13346 more words" — prompting plenty of laughs on X.

Original post →

More from Fun

Fun channel →