llama.cpp keeps closing the gap: months-long benchmarks show it now beats a custom vibe-coded engine

Danmoreng · reddit · 2026-11-16

Reddit user Danmoreng shares months of informal benchmarks on an RTX 5080 16GB laptop: months ago he easily beat llama.cpp with his own vibe-coded inference engine, but re-testing shows llama.cpp has caught up and surpassed it.

Methodology: fixed 16k prefill / 1k output on Wikipedia text, optimal settings per engine. On Gemma 4 12B (same checkpoint), vLLM leads prefill at 6,937 tok/s vs llama.cpp 4,754; on Gemma 4 26B A4B (different quants, not apples-to-apples), llama.cpp wins decode and D2 decode at 202.9 tok/s. Takeaway: llama.cpp ships steady performance gains over time, and the author prefers the stable engine over vibe-coded alternatives.

Original post →

More from Infra

Infra channel →