Manheim: code review bottleneck argument crumbles as tools shift review to QA
davidmanheim · x · 2026-11-15
Continuing his critique, David Manheim notes the paper identifies code review as the employment bottleneck and predicts jobs will crater once it's removed. But approaches like artcraft already shift code review into user tests and QA, undermining that premise.
Related event: Researchers Clash Over Whether AI Has Already Automated Programming Jobs(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Insurance researcher pushes back: coding AI can't yet replace whole programmer teams — davidmanheim · 2026-11-15
- Business Owner With No Tech Background Nets $41,500 Deal 30 Days After Wiring Claude Into His Workflow — aryanXmahajan · 2026-11-15
- Musk Boosts Claim That 'AGI Has Been Achieved' via Multi-Model Stack — elonmusk · 2026-11-15
- If intelligence creates power, why assume it creates the right to use it? — PierceLilholt · 2026-11-15
- Funds pull $8.5B into India as AI trade unwinds, MSCI India rebounds 11% — nordicinst · 2026-11-15
- Anti-AI art circles turn on each other amid AI accusations and purity policing — flowersslop · 2026-11-15