Superintelligent AI won't beat diligent humans on values-heavy decisions, argues binarybits
binarybits · x · 2026-11-15
In a discussion with Raemon777, binarybits argues that even though strategy choices may involve painful tradeoffs (option X angers group A, option Y enrages group B), the space of possible strategies won't be so complex that a human CEO can't grasp the pros and cons.
He ties this back to the superintelligence question: on values-heavy decisions, strategies cooked up by a superintelligent AI usually won't be dramatically better than those from a smart, diligent human — a pushback against the narrative that AI will decisively out-think human leadership.
More from AGI Musings
- Judea Pearl backs Hinton's 'maternal instinct' as best answer to AI control — arieljalali · 2026-11-15
- The Last Generation to Know What It Felt Like Not to Know — r0ck3t23 · 2026-11-15
- Nathan Young backs Altman holding stock, urges 90% pledge not all-charity — NathanpmYoung · 2026-11-15
- "All engineering is now knowledge management": new Ontology Pipeline book argues AI depends on it — teodorio · 2026-11-15
- Redditor's personal AGI benchmark: a model must autonomously recompile complex software — NowaVision · 2026-11-15
- Superintelligent AI strategies won't beat smart diligent humans on values-heavy decisions — binarybits · 2026-11-15