Professor says AI detection firm Pangram profits from panic: refusing AI in research is malpractice
ipeirotis · x · 2026-11-15
Panos Ipeirotis argues Pangram's business model monetizes anti-AI panic. Used honestly, AI makes research better; refusing to use it in research today is malpractice — his analogy: you don't ban surgical anesthesia just because people abuse fentanyl.
More from AGI Musings
- Can AI invent a new competitive game genre in 4 hours? 18 prototypes so far — gabriel1 · 2026-11-15
- Rohit Krishnan: defining the messiness AI can't do would let us hillclimb it away — BethMayBarnes · 2026-11-15
- Eric Schmidt: If I could bet on one AI theme, it would be long reasoning — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-15
- Formally specifying honesty or corrigibility remains far beyond our reach — BethMayBarnes · 2026-11-15
- Dev veteran: worst tech job market ever, 170k layoffs this year plus 60k Microsoft buyouts — ericelliott_ · 2026-11-15
- 'Solve biologists, not biology': a sharp take on Anthropic's AI ambitions — johnowhitaker · 2026-11-15