Pangram AI detector may judge by writing year, not text, user argues
madeofAjala · x · 2026-11-15
A user hypothesizes that Pangram's AI-text-detector bias defaults to origin year: anything pre-2020 is labeled non-AI while post-2020 text gets some AI score even with zero AI input, rather than analyzing actual content. As a (likely neural-network) classifier, it's prone to learning such spurious links; and no detector model achieves a perfect F1 score.
Related event: Users Question Pangram AI Detector for Judging by Year, Not Content(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Claude Opus 5.5 caught making a basic grammar mistake: 'Not much dramatic' — Pizzahunter3 · 2026-11-15
- Redditor proposes a 'normies benchmark': 95% task success equals good enough — AdDizzy8160 · 2026-11-15
- Gemini math lead reveals inside story: evals, post-training recipes, scaled runs — thtrieu_ · 2026-11-15
- Blogger saves $53 in 43 hours after switching from Claude Code to Gemini 4 Carbon — mazzaTalk · 2026-11-15
- SatBench: 63% of lab-cited AI benchmarks already saturated, and solving is speeding up — emollick · 2026-11-15
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B praised for local agent use: 37 tok/s on an AMD 780M iGPU — jeremyckahn · 2026-11-15