AI proofreading backfires: edited essays flagged as 20% AI and rejected by magazines
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-11-15
Scholar Nadya Williams warns that using AI "editors" like Grammarly or Claude to proofread your essay is a bad idea: the edits can push your text past AI detectors, flagging it as 20% AI-generated. Many magazines now refuse to publish anything that doesn't pass detection unless you can restore the all-human version.
A paradox of the current publishing ecosystem: the most basic AI assistance can taint genuinely human writing with suspicion of AI authorship.
More from AGI Musings
- Turing winner Patterson: general AI models will do most jobs by end of next year — davidpattersonx · 2026-11-15
- Sayash Kapoor Launches STABL Substack on Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI — ruthstarkman · 2026-11-15
- Protesters rally at San Francisco "Stop the AI race" demo with Don't Build Skynet signs — ronbodkin · 2026-11-15
- Reddit thread: most people think AI could drain the world's resources stuck in a loop — davidmorelo · 2026-11-15
- Open source only 3-6 months behind frontier AI, talk sparks doubts over frontier labs' returns — SchmidhuberAI · 2026-11-15
- 1938 Newspaper Clip Sparks Debate: Tech Panics Mask a Long March From Embodied Experience — sebpaquet · 2026-11-15