Security experts: LLM-accelerated lateral movement, not 0-days, is the real threat
AccBalanced · x · 2026-11-15
Security researcher dinodaizovi endorses S1r1u5's argument that organizations run massive amounts of third-party code they can't control, so the priority isn't hunting 0-days but containing compromises after initial access. With LLMs accelerating attackers' lateral movement, most organizations aren't prepared. His recommendations: eliminate lateral movement and global privilege escalation, adopt an assume-compromise mindset with isolation and monitoring, and shrink breach blast radius to a manageable size.
More from Safety
- HiveAttest adds pre-action attestation for AI agents with signed receipts per call — modelcontextprotocol · 2026-11-15
- Anthropic book settlement checks arrive — one author's payout covers a daily Venti latte till summer — dfinke · 2026-11-15
- A week of chaos: Microsoft outage, Notion and Cursor hit, unverified Nvidia CEO resignation claim — tech__unicorn · 2026-11-15
- Witten, Tong, Maldacena sign statement urging AI companies to openly release HEP research results — kylekabasares · 2026-11-15
- Geoffrey Hinton renews warning: superintelligent AI may be impossible to keep under control — VraserX · 2026-11-15
- Miles Brundage: Paul Christiano's Hinton Lectures are very, very good — Miles_Brundage · 2026-11-15