RSI debate: real training innovation, or just AI substituting for human review?
dyn___ · x · 2026-11-14
Following up on his RSI critique, dyn asks whether current claims involve anything novel in training or algorithms, or merely substitute models for human review of scores, trajectories and failure analysis. He reads the labs' framing as deliberately conflating RSI-as-help with RSI-as-takeoff to control the narrative.
Related event: Developers Question Whether 'Recursive Self-Improvement' Is Real(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Alignment debate: solving alignment "for everyone" is impossible in current paradigm — jsuarez · 2026-11-14
- Isomorphic Labs: AI could move drug discovery from slow lab work into software — VraserX · 2026-11-14
- 'Hard Pill to Swallow: AI Is Pay to Win' — Tweet Sparks Pricing Debate — prasenx · 2026-11-14
- Fed Governor Barr: AI Could Boost Productivity While Widening US Inequality — robseamans · 2026-11-14
- Buyer spending $10M/yr on legal fees says AI will do 90% of M&A legal work within 5 years — jkubicki · 2026-11-14
- Dev pushes back on RSI hype: frontier labs just have 'infinite tokens' and use AI for everything — dyn___ · 2026-11-14