SPU benchmark: frontier models fail at predicting 4,207 real wet-lab experiments

量子位 · wechat · 2026-11-14

UniPatAI has released Science Prediction Universe (SPU), a benchmark that skips quiz-style testing: models get experimental conditions and must autonomously search, compute, and predict the outcome ranking of real wet-lab experiments within 8 hours (8-core CPU, 16GiB RAM, one H20 GPU). It covers 116 tasks and 4,207 experiments across chemistry, materials science, biology, and medicine (32 subfields), with advisors from Stanford, Cornell, Harvard and others; dataset and code are open-sourced.

The first round evaluated 12 frontier models in 13 configurations, with sobering results: the best average score was Claude Opus 5.5 at 0.486, and only 34%52% of tasks per configuration beat the randomness threshold. Several counterintuitive findings emerged:

Failure analysis shows errors often occur at the "choosing the right basis" step: in a solvent-ranking task, Qwen3.8 ranked by ethylene solubility while Opus 5.5 considered miscibility and catalyst compatibility (0.874 vs -0.126). The team suggests testing models on SPU tasks matching your target measurement before deploying them in research. SPU joins UniPatAI's broader suite including ScienceVision, PaperBenchX, SaaS-Bench, and EvoCode-Bench.

Related event: New SPU benchmark finds frontier AI agents fail at predicting wet-lab results(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from Research

Research channel →