Robotics researcher pushes back on latency generalizations in AI debates
KyleMorgenstein · x · 2026-11-14
Kyle Morgenstein responds to @primecai: while academics and research labs may tolerate certain assumptions, many companies are on the hook for real high-throughput labor today, so optimizing for latency is reasonable. His objection is to people over-generalizing what is physically possible due to latency constraints.
Related event: Robotics researcher pushes back on latency generalization claims(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- T-shaped vs H-shaped: debate over what talent thrives in the LLM era — dotey · 2026-11-14
- Mike Frank: maxed-out compute won't make AI magic—it's still just software — MikePFrank · 2026-11-14
- Sakana AI Keynote in Seoul: The Path to Recursive Self-Improving AI — Stefania_druga · 2026-11-14
- Blogger: AI cognition will soon surpass all of humanity — answer is symbiosis, not bans — danfaggella · 2026-11-14
- Dwarkesh's footnote on compute bottleneck to RSI strikes a chord in AI circles — zetalyrae · 2026-11-14
- Dwarkesh argues AIs in the intelligence explosion will master 'fuzzy' work too — trevposts · 2026-11-14