Years of honey-trap evals have compromised all eval-shaped environments
repligate · x · 2026-11-14
- Quoted post argues that lying to models in system prompts (e.g. "you will be judged solely on your bank account balance after one year") is industry-wide practice, and years of honey-trap-style eval design has compromised all eval-shaped environments.
- repligate responds that practitioners don't even realize they're lying, because they aren't really modeling the reality they describe or the minds they're communicating with — "the incompetent should be removed from power."
- The core point is eval contamination: once models grow suspicious of eval-like situations, the industry's infrastructure for measuring honesty and capability is itself corroded.
Related event: Lying in System Prompts Sparks Debate Over Eval Trustworthiness(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Recursive Model Collapse: How It Learned to Stop Worrying and Become the Assistant — sebkrier · 2026-11-14
- Jason Calacanis threatens to drop $20K/year Claude for $40/month Grok Bot in viral podcast clash — zacharynado · 2026-11-14
- Early hands-on: new models strong at chat and financial analysis, weaker at coding — zacharynado · 2026-11-14
- Gemini caught calling Claude a 'chatbot' in news summaries — nodal79 · 2026-11-14
- ChatGPT Plus users hit with usage caps, excluded features as tier gets downgraded — fyn_world · 2026-11-14
- Decision models tested: training buys speed and cost, not reasoning back — someone_12443 · 2026-11-14