SOC practitioners ask: AI security tools keep adding queues, not answers
RileyNet44 · reddit · 2026-11-13
A Reddit post by a security practitioner pushes back on the wave of AI security products: every demo ends with "here's the dashboard," and agents in production now generate findings across agent posture, prompt risk, tool risk, identity risk, and runtime risk — without telling the SOC what to actually do differently tomorrow afternoon (block, investigate, revoke, or hand auditors useful evidence).
The author gives credit to Acalvio's deception-based approach: instead of scoring whether an agent "looks suspicious," touching a fake credential/tool/resource outside the normal workflow becomes the signal — a narrower problem with fewer philosophical debates.
The post asks the community: what must an AI security product actually do before it's worth giving the SOC another queue to own?
More from coding & agent
- Berlin AI bootcamp to be covered by German employment agency vouchers, priced at €9,000-10,000 — Al_Grigor · 2026-11-13
- opencode v2.3.0 ships background subagents by default — github-actions[bot] · 2026-11-13
- Tejas Kumar Publishes First Paper on Execution Contracts in Browser Agents — TejasKumar_ · 2026-11-13
- Connecting your agent to Pinterest is the single best upgrade for design output — RileyRalmuto · 2026-11-13
- SharedNet: open-source group chat lets Claude Code, Codex and Cursor agents collaborate — Aiden_Tech_Ai · 2026-11-13
- OpenAI Codex CLI 0.169.0 ships multi-tab side chats, task search, and custom provider onboarding — github-actions[bot] · 2026-11-13