Which top ML conference will first give up against 200k automated submissions?
CharlotteHase · x · 2026-11-13
- ML practitioner Charlotte Hase asks which top-tier ML conference will be the first to admit defeat and simply stop, now that submission counts may reach 200k — many fully automated.
- The post targets the strain AI-generated submissions put on peer review: once reviewing becomes theater, the conference format itself is being pushed to a breaking point.
More from AGI Musings
- Attack of the Clouds revisited: what the global Outlook outage says about centralization — technollama · 2026-11-13
- Why AI and Consciousness May Never Meet — marigo · 2026-11-13
- In the Age of AI, Human Capability Is the Real Advantage — uxmag · 2026-11-13
- Robotics researcher: manipulation may no longer be the best area for academic research — AvivTamar1 · 2026-11-13
- Vet dev: AI-written game engines aren't cheating, they're the next Unity moment — bendee983 · 2026-11-13
- Podcaster Shao Nan quits AI writing: "What it writes ultimately belongs to it" — oran_ge · 2026-11-13