Economist on AI plagiarism dispute: an innocent author would publish their Google Doc history
paulnovosad · x · 2026-11-12
Economist Paul Novosad comments on an academic AI-writing misconduct dispute. He argues he would be comfortable litigating on the combination of: text that strongly reads as AI-generated, confirmation by detection tool Pangram, and the accused refusing to provide document history.
He notes that in this case the accused claims to have a document history that could decisively clear them—so if truly innocent, the author should post 100% of their Google Doc logs. Instead, their approach is to repeat denials, refuse to acknowledge either AI use or AI detection, and hope the matter fades. Novosad calls this textbook behavior that makes institutions irrelevant.
Related event: Economist weighs in on literary AI detection dispute(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI Has Made Framework Switching Costs Lower Than Ever, Argues Frameworks Author — Vjeux · 2026-11-13
- The perfect cognitive style for the Agent Age — but you only get 2 of 3 traits — _AustinCalvert_ · 2026-11-13
- "So close to a golden age, held hostage by the small-minded": an AI-era lament — ATTlKA · 2026-11-13
- "A legendary hero of the AI age has fallen": KOL hints at major industry drama — DeryaTR_ · 2026-11-13
- Northwestern's Jessica Hullman to lecture on validating LLM simulations of human behavior — JessicaHullman · 2026-11-13
- Paul Scharre launches CNAS AI Policy Lab: 'This is the moment' for AI policy — paul_scharre · 2026-11-13