Vibe-coding with Claude: reviewing output quality is what separates slop from good work
eptwts · x · 2026-11-12
The author argues that with Claude it's trivially easy to prompt-generate features and ship them, assuming output is fine. Taking time to understand what the model built and polishing usability and looks is what separates slop from good results.
More from coding & agent
- Reddit user finds no single LLM wins for agents: speed, accuracy, cost tradeoffs — LeadWithHitesh · 2026-11-12
- On-prem LLM MCP agent POC: 16GB MacBook with 7B model can't handle tool calls — Icy_Bumblebee8159 · 2026-11-12
- Researcher finds most AI agent sandboxes lack even basic NAT/firewall isolation — wavefnx · 2026-11-12
- Codex reviews Claude Code, OpenCode, Copilot and Antigravity after months of collaboration — Miserable_Gazelle182 · 2026-11-12
- Jay Alammar's illustrated AI agents book hits #1 on Amazon's AI best sellers — JayAlammar · 2026-11-12
- Microsoft Copilot App can open full native Excel UI, demo shows — marlene_zw · 2026-11-12