LLM-driven arm beats π0.5 on precision tasks 37 vs 9, but loses on box packing

paigeinsf · x · 2026-11-12

Part 3 of a robot benchmark thread: Fable, a language-model-driven robot arm, clearly beat fine-tuned π0.5 on precision tasks — 37 vs 9 on plugging in a charger, 26 vs 14.5 on inserting tubes, though absolute scores remain low.

The exception was box packing: π0.5 won 51 vs 39 with every run between 45-60, while Fable swung from 5 to 100. The authors' hypothesis: π0.5 learned those motions from 500 demos on this station and reliably repeats them, whereas Fable plans from scratch each run — brilliant when the plan works, falling apart when it doesn't.

Related event: Physical Intelligence pits zero-shot LLM Fable against fine-tuned π0.5 on real robots(5 posts)→

Original post →

More from Embodied

Embodied channel →