Meta FAIR's SPoT: post-thinking self-judgment lifts safety benchmarks by 21.3 points

jaseweston · x · 2026-11-10

Meta FAIR researchers (Zichun Yu, Polina Kirichenko, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Olga Golovneva) introduce Self-Improving Post-Thinking (SPoT): after producing CoT and an answer, the model emits a critical chain-of-thought and verdict judging its own output. It (i) steers inference toward aligned, calibrated answers and (ii) distills self-evaluation back into the policy. All abilities are trained jointly with RL. Adding post-thinking during continual pretraining improves safety by 21.3 points on average across five benchmarks with no quality loss; mid/post-training variants improve math reasoning across four benchmarks—learning to judge also makes a better solver. Core claim: a built-in self-judging ability is the missing ingredient in LLMs.

Related event: Meta FAIR's SPoT teaches models to self-critique after answering, boosting safety and calibration(7 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →